Anger at train fare rises
RAIL passengers in the Westcountry will be hit by some of the biggest fare increases in the UK after train companies revealed a steep rise in ticket prices.
Some Cross Country Trains routes will see fares soar by more than 11 per cent – almost three times the rate of inflation.
-

CrossCountry
And First Great Western, which runs services out of Penzance, Plymouth and Exeter, says average prices will go up by 7 per cent.
The news comes days after it was revealed the strained South West rail network will get just eight new carriages to help cope with rising passenger levels over the next eight years.
Passengers have reacted with a mixture of astonishment and fury, with one Westcountry MP condemning the "astronomical" price rises which are due to come into force in January 2009. Regular rail user Adrian Sanders, Lib-Dem MP for Torbay, said: "Are we going to see a percentage equivalent rise in punctuality, comfort or capacity? I don't think so.
"I really don't see what justification there can possibly be for above-inflation increases given the fact passenger numbers are increasing. It can only be that the companies want to put people off using the trains because they don't have the extra capacity to deal with them."
Cross Country is putting up the cost of its regulated fares, which include season tickets, by an average of 6 per cent.
The company, which runs regular services from Penzance, Plymouth and Exeter to Manchester, Birmingham and Edinburgh, will push its unregulated fares up by 11 per cent. These include most leisure and advance fare tickets.
Cross Country said the changes were necessary to "allow us to continue investing in a better travel experience for our customers".
But Mr Sanders said: "Train operators have been saying this for many years now and to be fair there have been some improvements in punctuality and refurbishments.
"But the key to this is increasing capacity. We should be trying to encourage more people to use railways, which means putting on more services and not putting on above-inflation increases in fares.
"We live in a country where it is cheaper to fly to Alicante than it is to get a train from Exeter to London. Putting up prices even more will just keep people away from trains."
FGW will put up regulated fares, which are linked to inflation, by 6 per cent and unregulated fares by 6.6 per cent.
This will see the cost of a standard (peak) return ticket from Exeter to Paddington rise from £179 to £196.
However, some fares will fall in price. The same journey from Penzance to Paddington will go from £257 to £239. Some first-class fares will also fall.
An FGW spokesman said: "From our point of view we have done our very, very best to keep fares down. The issue we face is our costs are rising above inflation and we've got to deal with that now. We've tried to reduce the impact on customers."
South West Trains, which runs regular services from Plymouth and Exeter to Waterloo, will put up regulated fares by 6 per cent and unregulated fares by 7.2 per cent. The cost of a peak return from Exeter will rise from £105 to £113.
A spokesman for the company said: "South West Trains continues to invest, including £3.5 million on station improvements last year, £1.8 million on security guards, £12 million overall on ticket machines and car park expansions."
Peter Mulley, Westcountry secretary for the passenger group Railfuture, said: "Obviously this is something we are very disappointed about. The main effect will be that people will make fewer journeys on the trains.
"It should be said that if passengers can find an off-peak ticket they will probably find a bargain. However, the ticket system is so complicated that passengers are confused by it all.
"There has been more investment in the services in recent years but continually putting up prices is not the way to encourage rail use."
David Redgewell, regional spokesman for the Campaign for Better Transport, said the Government was to blame for the fare increases because it was cutting the amount of direct subsidy from the taxpayer.
"This means that in the future prices will just go up and up as the burden falls on the fare payer," he said.
He said improvements to the service in the South West were limited to a three- mile stretch of line between Axminster and Chard.
"I'm yet to see how Cross Country are improving; they have already cut their buffet service. Most of the improvements will be outside the South West," he said.
Anthony Smith, chief executive of customer watchdog Passenger Focus, said: "These average fares will no doubt mask some very steep rises on particular routes. We will study the real impact as we unearth the details in the next few days."








6 Comments
by Charles Henry, Somerset
Monday, November 24 2008, 11:26AM
“It's time they turned large sections of the rail network into roads. . Road transport is self-financing. . That would be the ideal financial stimulus in this down turn. . It would reduce national congestion by integrating the populace more closely to the road network once more. . If railways didn't exist, I don't believe we wouldn't invent now. . Why would we invent something that means hauling hundreds of tons around the country-side half-empty when we should be looking at something like the TWIKE for travel.”
by Mavis Rook, Manadon
Sunday, November 23 2008, 10:10PM
“My husband and I used to take the train to London, and enjoy a lovely meal in the dining car at a reasonable cost.”
by elisabete Durfey, USA
Sunday, November 23 2008, 8:26PM
“I agree with you sean, we try to be more environmentally conscious and not use cars so much, and then this happens... Needs to be some kind of imposed regulation as to how much these companies can raise their fares. Like you said, easier and cheaper to just buy a car, unfortunately.”
by Sean, Kernow
Sunday, November 23 2008, 2:34PM
“Based on these rises, me and my partner decided to buy a car and get to work that way.
We decided that we where no longer be the vitim of multi corporate pirates who's only goal is to extract as much money as they can from it's captive audience.
Well, long and short of it is with a 2.5% decrease in tax reductions on fuel and 18% drop in litre prices means it's actually 70% cheaper per day for me to drive than it is to catch the train.
These price rises are a complete rip off, we have the worst rolling stock in the country, we have to stand on the way to work in the morning and the government have given us just 8 new carrages out of the 1000 awarded to the rest of the country.
Last time I checked, I didn't have victim written across my forehead.. I would ask you all to buy a car.. and send Great western into Administration. Only then will we show that the people will not be walked over!”
by Lesley, Tampa FL
Saturday, November 22 2008, 7:59PM
“I recently traveled from Gatwick to Plymouth (and back) by train and although the service was on time and I have no complaints about that, I thought the price was ridiculous. I have also flown from Gatwick to Plymouth which is cheaper but less convenient due to the location of the Plymouth Airport. However, if the prices keep going up on the trains, I will be flying on future trips.”
by Neil, Perth, Western Australia
Saturday, November 22 2008, 2:37PM
“I recently travelled on an excellent coach service from Heathrow to Exeter and return for a fraction of these prices. Why the hell would anyone go by train,with bad service and astronomical prices?”