Aid deal for forces' families
FORCES' families are to benefit from better access to
schools, doctors, dentists and degree courses under a massive
overhaul of the way the state treats the loved ones of
front-line troops.
Defence Secretary Des Browne said the Government was
determined to “make a real difference to the everyday lives of
our forces and their families”.
Every major Government department was told to reconsider the
way it deals with forces families which in future could mean
“special treatment” where particular sacrifices have been
made.
The move was welcomed in the Westcountry where campaigners
have complained about the way public services – particularly
the NHS and schools – fail to take into account the unique
demands of military life.
With the Navy, RAF and Royal Marines based across the region
many of the changes will be keenly felt by communities with
long-term links to the military.
It was also announced that compensation for the most
seriously injured personnel will double recognition of their
life-long challenges with disability as a result of their
service.
Publishing the document outlining The Nation's Commitment,
Mr Browne said: “Our armed forces are truly inspiring – every
day they risk their lives to keep us safe – and it is a
fundamental duty of government to support them and their
families.”
Senior officers see the welfare package as crucial to
building up manning levels across services by improving
retention rates.
It comes after an internal Ministry of Defence survey found
that 47 per cent of those serving in the Army and Navy – and
almost as many personnel in the RAF – regularly considered
quitting.
The First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Jonathon Band said Royal Navy
and Royal Marines personnel and their families “deserve nothing
but the best”.
Plymouth Sutton MP Alison Seabeck said many of her
constituents in the city had complained of the difficulties in
accessing healthcare and schooling when moving around the
country with relatives who are in the forces.
“They will be very pleased with the outcome because for most
people it is the small things impacting on their day-to-day
lives which makes things more complicated for them than other
families.”
She said personnel deployed to conflict zones overseas
should not have the “stress and worry” of how their families
are coping.
Exeter MP and Health Minister Ben Bradshaw said: “Our
service men and women do an outstanding job and we all owe them
a debt of gratitude and a duty of care.”
Opposition parties, who have levelled criticism at the
Government over the welfare of military families, welcomed the
package. But they insisted it would take time to reverse the
“damage”.
Liberal Democrat defence spokesman Nick Harvey said:
“Hopefully, these measures will improve the lot of forces
personnel, but they cannot repair the damage already done by
the long-term neglect of the welfare of servicemen and
women.”
The North Devon MP added: “Neither will the changes make any
significant difference to the intense pressures that forces
families are put under by the critical overstretch of our armed
forces.”
Shadow defence secretary Liam Fox said the measures echoed
Tory proposals, but the package “cannot disguise Labour's
decade-long neglect of the armed forces”.
And John Muxworthy, chief executive of the UK National
Defence Association, said: “Issues such as compensation or
post-service education are merely the tip of the iceberg.”








2 Comments
by Patrick Griffin, St Breward
Monday, July 21 2008, 5:04PM
“No so long ago there a number of military hospitals throughout the country. Military doctors and dentists were fobidden to treat families as they would be competing with the NHS even where they had the spare capacity. Now all the military hospitals have been closed and the medical staff greatly reduced. So much for long term planning.”
by John, St Tudy
Saturday, July 19 2008, 11:54AM
“This is good news, however if I heard it correctly on an interview on the radio, there is no extra money being provided. What has to be found, will come from cutting something else in a budget that is already over stretched, whether it is for schools or health or the Services.
The usual Labour spin, trumpeted as something new.”