Beavers 'would cause no harm'
THE reintroduction of beavers into the English countryside would present "no serious threat" to farming and would not damage woodlands, one of the country's leading experts has claimed.
Responding to questions raised by the Western Morning News, conservationist Derek Gow has moved to allay fears that returning the nocturnal rodents to the wild would cause chaos because of damming rivers and creating lodges.
-

His comments follow the WMN's revelation that South West Water is considering relocating beavers to a 730-acre reservoir in West Devon to combat pollution of drinking water. The dam-building project, at Roadford Lake, is thought to be the most advanced of its kind in returning the native animal to England since the beaver was hunted to extinction in this country hundreds of years ago. At the same time, countryside agency Natural England is considering whether or not to follow Scotland's lead by restoring the European beaver to the wild. The issue is pertinent to the Westcountry as beavers are thought to have a greater chance of surviving – and being contained – among the rivers and heavy woodlands of Devon and Cornwall, making the region ideal for trials.
That beavers have not roamed wild in England for more than 800 years became more widely understood after a six-stone beaver escaped from Mr Gow's animal sanctuary on the Devon-Cornwall border, felling trees in his wake.
Correspondence in the WMN has questioned whether dam-building would flood low-lying farmland, impede the passage of migratory fish and prompt a wave of damaging, unintended consequences. Mr Gow – who points out that beavers were around in England 50 million years before humans arrived – conceded that a balance needed to be struck between the animals "fitting in with human activities" and "our reasonable tolerance of theirs".
But beavers would be a vital cog in the eco-system as activities such as dam-building, tree-felling and lodge creation "positively influence the living prospects of very many other species".
Westcountry-based Mr Gow, who is advising both Natural England and South West Water, said: "European beavers and their activities pose no serious threat to human land use.
"Beaver activity is quite typically confined to a 10 to 30-metre zone from the water's edge. Beaver dams in the 'wrong' location can be easily and cheaply drained or removed, culverts can be averted from blockage by simple wire mesh flow devices and trees can be protected from felling by wire-mesh guards or unobtrusive rubberised sand-paint."
He said in the medium-term, beavers causing localised problems would be "translocated or humanely culled."
Mr Gow, who has travelled Europe since 1994 studying beaver restoration projects and quarantined more than 80 beavers, said humans and beavers could live harmoniously. "Beaver families live in or around large cities and towns such as Munich, Salzburg, Amsterdam and Oslo without any significant effect on human activity."
Controversial plans to restore the beaver were given the go-ahead by the Scottish government last year.












7 Comments
View all
by Chris Durston, Beaworthy
Monday, February 02 2009, 7:24PM
“Glad to see the balance of comments is with the sane view. As we all know the world, and our country in particular, is in a bit of a state at present. Quite remarkable that there still seems to be a huge pot of our money available to promote these lunatic schemes. Of course when it all goes horribly wrong more of our money will be thrown at it and we'll still have to live with the problem that should never have been there. The 'sandal wearers' are trying to run the world!!”
by Charles Henry, Somerset
Monday, February 02 2009, 8:58AM
“Thankyou Jim. . I'm afraid it is the modern curse over here in the UK right now. . . There are increasing numbers of misguided bunny-huggers over here, that are determined to try and prove they know better than our forefathers did in managing natures pests. . .”
by Jim Sheppard, Ottawa, ON Canada
Monday, February 02 2009, 4:24AM
“Living here in Canada- the land of the beaver and a land owner plagued by colonies of beaver I can only shake my head in dismay.
These are not the furry rodents of Walt Disney - they are pests
"Beaver activity is quite typically confined to a 10 to 30-metre zone from the water's edge" and as their pond grows and the water's edge expands???
I have watched as a "picturesque 10 acre duck pond" estate agent speak for beaver pond turn into a 40 acre swamp surrounded by dead and dying trees due to the raised water levels.
"Culverts can be averted from blockage by simple wire mesh flow devices" don't count on it ! Beavers may be a nuisance but they are not stupid. I'd give a mire mesh flow device about a month before they have figured it out and plugged it solid!
Have fun and remember beaver coats may be heavy but they are warm!”
by henry blince, torbay
Sunday, February 01 2009, 6:17PM
“and I'll bet not a damned one of you have seen a beaver, let alone know anything about them other than that they build dams and fell trees.”
by Chris Durston, Beaworthy
Saturday, January 31 2009, 6:35PM
“Well,here we go again, more of the same old 'facts' being trotted out. Beavers do cut down trees,they dam waterways therefore they change the water level and must cause some flooding. They must alter the riparian habitat, maybe improving the prospects for some species maybe damaging the prospects for others. No such thing as a free lunch so gain for one at the expense of another makes no sense to me.
The fact that beaver were present 50 million years before humans seems totally irrelevant.
Oh yes, an important point being missed is that these proposals are not going to affect Mr Gow's land nor SWW. This is about suggesting that it is o.k.to impose an experiment like this on other people's property. I honestly thought that if one worked to acheive ownership of a property then that also gave the right to have control of it?”