Plymouth City Council fights to block development on Plymouth Airport site
COUNCIL planners fought to block development on Plymouth Airport yesterday as a public inquiry into the north of the city got under way.
Plans by Sutton Harbour Holdings, the former airport operator, to create a new district centre at Roborough were "nonsensical", Jonathan Bell, the council head of development planning said.
-

Plymouth airport - one of four sites competing to be a new district centre
He told government planning inspector Andrew Seaman that the area action plan for Derriford and Seaton set out to create a new heart for the north of the city. The airport site was "clearly in the wrong location", Mr Bell said.
The council wants to put a new shopping centre on the old Seaton Barracks parade ground.
BRAND NEW FORD B-MAX ZETEC 1.0 ECOBOOST FOR ONLY £7685*
View details
DRIVE AWAY A BRAND NEW FORD B-MAX ZETEC FOR ONLY £7685.
1.0 100PS Manual
WITH:
Electric Windows & Mirrors
Quickclear Heated Windscreen
15" Alloy Wheels
Bluetooth with Ford Sync
Fog Lights
Terms:
*Drive away from only £7685 and then pay nothing for 24 months!
4.9% APR
Conditions Apply
Contact: 01626 240583
Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013
The hearing into the "soundness" of the plan was a battle for the heart of north Plymouth, with no fewer than four rival plans vying for supremacy.
The council and Wharfside Regeneration renewed their argument from last autumn over the suitability of the North West Quadrant site, next to Derriford Hospital.
Philip Robin for Wharfside said they were in a position to deliver much sooner than the other proposals.
"The site is available now. We already have a planning application, the car park is under construction," he said.
South West Water is proposing a major new shopping development on land it owns next to Crownhill Fort.
Thomas Hill, QC, for Sutton Harbour, dismissed the three rival bids. He told the hearing in the Jurys Inn in Plymouth that the council argued that Derriford was the centre of gravity for the area. "Our case is that it's the centre of congestion," Mr Hill said. "You should not inflict a district centre on this groaning part of the road network."
Mr Bell said that using the airport land was "completely contrary" to the city's core strategy, even though development was not explicitly ruled out.
Philip Heseltine, the council's head of transport strategy, said that half of all trips created by new development would need to be made without cars. Derriford hospital was the centre of the northern bus network and a new shopping centre in Roborough would mean unnecessary bus trips with low passenger numbers.
Mr Hill accused the planners of bowing to political pressure.
Richard Crocker, a director of Viable, which is bidding to buy the airport, told the inquiry: "We are not dreamers or romantics. We are experienced business people with vision."
Although a report commissioned by Plymouth City Council suggested the airport was not viable, Mr Crocker said that commercial judgement had no bearing on the planning issues.
He said Viable had had clarification directly from the Civil Aviation Authority that it could operate the site as an unlicensed aerodrome initially, and later acquire a licence.
He said Viable planned to extend the airport to 1,309 metres, making it comparable with London City Airport, and Sutton Harbour was the main obstacle.
Mr Hill said Sutton Harbour had also been in contact with the CAA and had confirmation that Viable would not get a licence for a runway of 1,319 metres, the length of London City Airport.
Richard Grant, the council's local plan team leader, said the new community in the north should have a High Street format and major food store but not compete with city centre.
But representatives for the two big city centre landowners, British Land and Prudential Property Investment Managers, said that too much space was being allowed for shops, which would lead to an exodus from the city centre.
The inquiry continues next week.




9 Comments
by rowntree
Friday, March 22 2013, 1:12PM
“stop dithering pcc get your finger,s out and fight for the airport”
by Foldart
Friday, March 22 2013, 11:56AM
“The council have a 'core strategy'? Ample parking on the ole dis-used, derelict airport. Makes more sense to have a new retail centre there. Could even squeeze a bigger Park and Ride there.”
by jannersontour
Friday, March 22 2013, 11:54AM
“Shoping or an airport?
Honestly whata town, even harry hill would have a problem shorting this lot out.
Theres only one way to find out........”
by Dunthiel
Friday, March 22 2013, 11:27AM
“@Waltersmith
That's pretty much it I believe. It makes sense, for instance London City has a runway some 1,500m long, but their declared take off distance is just the same as it could be at Plymouth - 1,199m.
Although by the time any extension was being certified at Plymouth it wouldn't be done so according to the CAA's regulations; come 2014 it will be replaced by European wide legislation passed in Brussels. This same legislation will have to license airports in other parts of Europe which would make the CAA fall off their chair, aptly demonstrating that we already have the highest standards of aerodrome design and safety here in the UK, and that includes Plymouth Airport.”
by plympaul
Friday, March 22 2013, 11:23AM
“f.f.s we dont need this new shops and new houses we all from plymouth would like our airport back!!”
by 10thattempt
Friday, March 22 2013, 10:21AM
“Given the traffic chaos on the A38 around Manadon and up Tavistock Rd each for the last 2 months when all they've done is close Morlaix Drive into the hospital, if they develop Seaton area into a village we'll have queues back to the Tamar Bridge.”
by Waltersmith
Friday, March 22 2013, 10:21AM
“@Dunthiel
I see, so SHH assume that the runway for take off would be 1319 metres long and therefore would not be certified by the CAA but Viable would limit the take off length to 1199 metres so it would gain a licence.
SHH are certainly as cunning as a cunning fox”
by Dunthiel
Friday, March 22 2013, 9:55AM
“It's refreshing to see the council fighting their corner, and with that the airport's corner. They appear to have woken up to how important the airport is to Plymouth.
Regarding the runway length, for take off I know it's limited by the CAA to 1,199m, but for landing there is no limit. From reading about/listening to Viable's plans they seem fully aware of this, and plan to offer the longest landing distance feasible on the site (1,319m) because it's safer.”
by Waltersmith
Friday, March 22 2013, 8:09AM
“So, if the runway is 1309 metres the CAA will give a licence, if it is 1319 metres the CAA won't give a licence.
I do like the fact that PCC are in competition with SHH with SWW and Wharfside in the fray as well”