Student badly hurt when he fell on council land won't get a penny in compensation
A PLYMOUTH student catastrophically injured when he fell 20ft from council-owned land will not get a penny in compensation, a court has ruled.
Jonathan Harvey, from Tamerton Foliot, was lucky to survive when he tripped over a chainlink fence and plunged over a wall seven years ago.
-

Jonathan Harvey
Mr Harvey, now 28, landed on the concrete car park of Woolwell's Tesco store in the early hours of April 18, 2003.
Although doctors saved his life, brain damage left him with difficulties walking and talking.
The physiotherapy student, who had drunk up to eight pints, was running from a taxi as part of a prank when he tripped.
He sought damages from Plymouth City Council, arguing the area was unsafe and the fence in disrepair.
A High Court judge ruled last year that, although Mr Harvey should shoulder most of the blame for the accident, the council should take 25 per cent of legal liability.
But the council challenged that ruling at the Court of Appeal, saying it placed an impossible burden on landowners and risked opening a litigation floodgate.
Top judges yesterday said they had "considerable sympathy" for Mr Harvey, but ruled the council was not even partially responsible.
The council's barrister, Edward Faulks QC, told the court Mr Harvey had been making "extraordinary and unusual use" of the wasteland.
"You can invite someone into your house, but you don't invite them to slide down the banisters," he added.
In his ruling, Lord Justice Carnwath said Mr Harvey dismissed the argument that the council owed him no legal duty as "unrealistic".
However, he said that because Mr Harvey could not meet the legal definition of a "visitor", the council's appeal must succeed.
He added: "I reach this conclusion with considerable sympathy for the claimant, whose life has been blighted by a tragic accident."
Mr Harvey, who did not travel to London for the hearing, declined to comment.
But, speaking after the ruling, he thanked his friends, family and legal team "for all their help and support" throughout his battle.
A council spokesman said: "This is a very sad case where a young man has been left with life-changing injuries.
"The council is satisfied with today's judgment in the Court of Appeal, where Lord Justice Carnwath stated the council's responsibilities do not extend to Mr Harvey's activities on the night in question. The council will be considering the full details of the judgment with its lawyers in due course.
"This was a tragic accident and the council has considerable sympathy for Mr Harvey."












47 Comments
View all
by Mick, Plymouth
Friday, July 30 2010, 8:24PM
“Drunk falls over, gets hurt, tries to blame someone else, fails.
Nothing to see here, move along now.”
by KW, Plymouth
Friday, July 30 2010, 7:27PM
“Serves him right im afraid, you run away without paying a taxi fare and fall whilst drunk then that is your own fault. The fact that he didnt attend the court hearing in London tells me that he knew he was going to lose the case. Well done judge.”
by me, plymouth
Friday, July 30 2010, 6:54PM
“silly me making a spelling mistake, long day at work. I mean't "run".”
by me, plymouth
Friday, July 30 2010, 6:52PM
“This was in the Herald in November 2009 "Before the fare for the taxi was paid in full, Mr Harvey and one of his friends ran off in order to make another member of their group pay his share of what was owed". To be honest if he had not of rang away, the accident would not have happened. Maybe he should have paid his part of the fare, walked away and he would have had an enjoyable evening. Just think he would have been a qualified Physiotherapist now. All this for one silly drunken mistake.”
by Kate, Plymouth
Friday, July 30 2010, 6:52PM
“@ ....., ......? Of course money was the motivation!!!!!
Common sense at last, now if only Judge Gilbert would get some”