Defence chief says scrapping warships has created 'ridiculous situation'
BRITAIN'S defence chief has raised concerns over the shortage of warships and the impact this has on operations in the wake of cutbacks which saw Devonport-based frigates scrapped.
General Sir David Richards has warned the lack of ships had led to the 'ridiculous' situation where the Navy was forced to use its most advanced vessels for basic tasks such as tackling Somali pirates in small dhows armed with rocket propelled grenades.
-

HMS Albion
This had to be sorted out he said.
In a speech Sir David also said ministers had made military cutbacks without reducing operational demands, and indicated this could not continue.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013
"If you reduce your Armed Forces, there is going to be a give – something gives," he said.
Sir David also criticised the failure to find a "political resolution" in Afghanistan despite the opportunities provided by the military.
In addition to slashing 5,000 jobs in the Navy, all four of Plymouth's Type 22 frigates have been scrapped, and one of Devonport's amphibious assault ships mothballed, as part of the biggest round of defence cuts since the end of the Cold War.
In a lecture at Oxford University, Sir David said: "One of my biggest concerns is the number of frigates and destroyers the Navy has."
A shortage of ships meant using hi-tech warships to tackle piracy in the Indian Ocean.
He said: "you get this ridiculous situation where in Operation Atalanta off the Somali coast, we have £1 billion destroyers trying to sort out pirates in a little dhow with RPGs costing $50, with an outboard motor costing $100.
"That can't be good. We've got to sort it out."
Sir David also said ministers' demands had not changed to meet the reduced size of the military.
He said: "We have a whole load of tasks expected of us. Our political masters are quite happy to reduce the size of the Armed Forces, but their appetite to exercise influence on the world stage is, quite understandably, the same as it has always been.
"Often politicians say to me, 'can you go and do this?' I say to them, 'with what?'."
Sir David added: "If you reduce your Armed Forces, there is going to be a give – something gives."
Tory MP for South West Devon Gary Streeter agreed with Sir David's comments.
He said; "I think we will live to regret the scale of the cutting back of our armed forces.
"You have only to watch the news to see we are heading into uncertain waters, be it the Middle East or turbulence in parts of Europe.
"This is not the time to be let down our guard.
"I still think our defence budget should be increased."
Alison Seabeck, Labour MP for Plymouth Moor View and Shadow Defence Minister, said: "General Richards in his comments was voicing concerns that I have been hearing for quite some time.
"The problems in my view have arisen in my view as a result of the rushed Strategic Defence and Security Review.
"We really do need to consider very carefully what we as a nation want to do with our armed forces, and once that decision is made ensure that we have the people and kit in order to be able to meet those demands."
In a statement issued in the wake of his lecture last week, Sir David insisted that the military capability required under the defence review could be achieved with the resources available, but said: "It is right that candid military analysis keeps the Government aware of constraints while the Government, rightly, seeks to achieve the maximum effect with the assets available."




Comments
by BS_Hater
Monday, November 19 2012, 10:06PM
“Oh please, bleeding and bleating to save his job.
The navy is defunct and no longer required, when was our last naval conflict? 1982.....
The ships are rustbuckets with no spares and mostly inoperative systems and weapons.”
by CharlieDodd
Saturday, November 17 2012, 1:03AM
“Ni mind about pirates, the Navy is needed in the Channel to stop the frenchy fisherman pinching our scallops”
by Mark2Plym
Saturday, November 17 2012, 12:34AM
“To be honest what else would they be used for? They are there to be used if a more pressing need is required use them there.”
by plymptonlad
Friday, November 16 2012, 11:12PM
“bye bye to all that Oil off the falklands.”
by CharlieDodd
Friday, November 16 2012, 4:40PM
“..'Sir David said a shortage of ships meant using hi-tech warships to tackle piracy in the Indian Ocean'..
The best way to tackle piracy would be for the shipping lines to stick a couple of machine guns on their boats and order their crews to riddle any approaching pirate tub”
by Vinnie_Gar
Friday, November 16 2012, 11:32AM
“The personnel problems are just as bad if not worse.”
by Hearald
Friday, November 16 2012, 11:27AM
“how on earth do all these countries without any military survive? they must be under constant attack”
by arthur_p
Friday, November 16 2012, 10:19AM
“A couple more ships of the same class as HMS Echo are needed for tasks such as the one off Somalia.”
by Winstonsmith0
Friday, November 16 2012, 10:14AM
“Never mind, when we get our two, or is it one, no two . . . carriers at the end of this decade then we can shell out for aircraft from US suppliers to equip it.
Mind you, end of decade is a long way off. The US seem to be using drones for everything from taking out the bad guys to picking up a Mcdonalds from down the road - why not drone ships too? Maybe so small they could be delivered to the waterside by DHL to comply with EU sulphur-heavy diesel regulations.
Perhaps we should be looking at shrinking the fleet and doing everything remotely. Devonport already looks like a ghost town but thank goodness Babcock will still be able to significantly profit from the ultra cheap heat and electricity the taxpayers have stumped up for and the big payments for part building the new carriers.
Oh, look, it's all tied in neatly after all - they profit whether we build or not. How nice for the big American company.
Someone please remind me if there are any UK companies left in the UK.
Ah, the true face of business!”
by Nevman
Friday, November 16 2012, 8:57AM
“Perhaps someone should tell the general, who may not be familiar with large expanses of water, that it's not easy to pitch a base camp out at sea. Some sort of ship is normally used.”