Tories face hunt ban 'firestorm'
HUNT supporters have clashed with the Conservative Party over plans to repeal the controversial hunting ban.
Countryside campaigners have warned of a "firestorm" if the Conservatives fail to force through a flagship Bill to overthrow the controversial ban.
-

They fear that leader David Cameron is close to reneging on a promise he made last year to throw the full weight of a future Tory government behind repealing the Hunting Act, which makes it illegal to hunt with dogs.
Senior Tory figures told the Sunday Telegraph that the major change in party policy was under active consideration by the Shadow Cabinet.
They feared that a new Conservative government could find itself bogged down in Parliament if it tried to force through the legislation.
One leading hunt supporter said: "There will be a firestorm if it is not a Government Bill."
Earlier this week, Mr Cameron reiterated his determination to hold a Commons vote on overturning the hunting ban if the Conservatives came to power.
Anti-hunting protesters also made their feelings known outside the party's annual conference in Manchester, but Mr Cameron said the ban had been a "farce" since it came into effect in 2005.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that MPs would be allowed a free vote on the issue, adding: "That's what democracy is all about."
The Shadow Cabinet member in charge of hunting confirmed that the party was considering the move.
Nick Herbert, the shadow environment secretary, said: "We are working up various options about how we will do a repeal.
"We will give time for a vote on repeal but we have also said we don't intend to waste parliamentary time on this. We haven't said what form repeal would take in terms of a Bill."
A spokesman for the Countryside Alliance appeared to welcome the Tory's stance over a repeal, describing the hunting ban as "a ridiculously bad piece of legislation".
The spokesman said: "The commitment to a free vote has been clear since the last Conservative manifesto and David Cameron himself has talked about that leading to a Government Bill in Government time.
"We think this is the most open and sensible route for getting rid of what everyone accepts is a ridiculously bad piece of legislation and any other option is likely only to complicate what should be a straightforward process."
Last month, an Ipsos/Mori poll for the League Against Cruel Sports found that 76 per cent of people surveyed thought hunting with dogs was cruel and 59 per cent of voters would be less likely to back would-be MPs if they found out they supported hunts.












21 Comments
View all
by Freethinker, Cornwall
Tuesday, October 13 2009, 12:52PM
“I must agree with you Chris. The fox is very fine example of a natural predator. It's a shame that humans have to act in such an unsightly fashion chasing after a mammal that should be applauded for it's remarkable skills in hunting. I often think that the fox has far more brain capacity than those chasing after the fox, considering that foxes and humans are mammals.”
by Tony, Hayle
Tuesday, October 13 2009, 12:25PM
“The best thing to do is wait for the fox to kill a chicken then have a trial whereby you find the fox guilty of murder. You can then sentence the fox to be put down at which point you "accidently " let the fox slip away. At this point you can now hunt the fox down and everything will be above board.”
by Charles Henry 1945-(diuturnity), Somersetshire
Tuesday, October 13 2009, 11:38AM
“:| That should of course read 'passed' not past.”
by Charles Henry 1945-(diuturnity), Somersetshire
Tuesday, October 13 2009, 11:37AM
“:| If we examined all the Bills past by this Labour government carefully, we will find that their idea of 'popular' has more to do with their idea of what is now politically correct, rather than common decency. . I can only assume it was because so many of them were getting lost on Clapham Common.”
by Paul, West Devon
Tuesday, October 13 2009, 11:19AM
“Long live the ban!
The Tories will have far more important things to do than repeal this popular piece of animal welfare legislation, if they've got any sense.”