Fish leaders attack 'nanny state' watchdog
PLANS to urge people to eat more ethically sourced fish have been condemned as a further step towards the "nanny state" by Westcountry fisheries leaders.
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is launching a consultation on whether to signpost shoppers towards species not thought to be at risk from over-fishing.
-

Nathan de Rozarieux
But Nathan de Rozarieux, project director of Seafood Cornwall, an EU-funded fisheries programme, said consumers were already well-informed and the FSA should steer clear.
"The FSA is just trying to be politically correct. I am very supportive of their advice for people to eat more fish, but if the agency takes the time to look at the science and at the evidence, they would see how far the industry has come on.
"There is so much bad news about non-sustainable cod stocks in the North Sea, for example, but if you look at the recent quota allocation, it went up by 30 per cent."
Mr de Rozarieux said consumers were aware – now more than ever – of sustainability issues and there were many highly successful, accredited schemes, such as one that tagged line-caught sea bass and enabled people to pinpoint exactly where and who caught their fish.
The watchdog should have spoken to sustainability experts and fishermen first "rather than taking this very public step" because "the FSA does not need to be the nanny state".
Jim Portus, of the South West Fish Producers' Organisation, said that sustainability issues were a driving force of the industry and it was a mistake to think fishermen were interested in jeopardising their future livelihood by destroying stocks.
Instead, the FSA should "stick to their job" of ensuring the nation's well-being and leave sustainability issues to others.
He added: "Thanks for your advice. The industry has got the message, the fisheries department has got the message, the fishermen have got the message, the EU in Brussels has got the message and we are all striving to achieve it."
The FSA already advises that everyone should eat at least two portions of fish a week, one of which should be an oily fish like mackerel. Its latest consultation paper is more geared towards environmental than health concerns.
It is thought to have been influenced by campaigns staged by the Marine Stewardship Council and Marine Conservation Society, which advise consumers on sustainability of stocks.
It has been estimated that a quarter of the world's fishing stocks are at risk from over-fishing, but the figures are highly contentious.
Many fishermen working on the front line say the science which underpins these findings is years old and fish stocks have never been healthier.
FSA head of nutrition Rosemary Hignett said: "Eating fish has considerable health benefits, so we will continue to encourage consumption as part of a drive to improve public health.
"But we recognise the potential impact our advice may have on demands for fish.
"'We know that issues relating to sustainability are important to consumers.
"By helping to ensure they have access to clear and reliable information about sustainable sources of fish, consumers will be able to make more informed choices."








3 Comments
by Nicolas Jouault, Jersey
Sunday, January 11 2009, 2:52PM
“The sea is a public domain and fishermen have not acted in a manner that could be called best practice, the recent case of illegal landings as a prime example.
What about all the seals and dolphins that killed as bycatch?
We need to see "No Take Zones" implemented , that will not only safeguard nature but the future of fishermen and the stocks that they rely upon.
All to often the issue is how much fishermen can exploit from the sea, it is about time other people had their say for all to benefit.”
by John Brooks, Redruth
Saturday, January 10 2009, 7:51PM
“If fish stocks are so brilliant, why are the recorded landings at Newlyn falling in value?
On 29 December Radio Cornwall made a brief mention of the £31 million regeneration plan for Newlyn. The announcer said that the last twelve months landings into Newlyn were down to £14 million.
The previous14 years look like:
1994 £22 million
1995 24
1996 23
1997 23
1998 22
1999 17
2000 18
2001 18
2002 19
2003 18
2004 16
2005 18
2006 19
2007 18
Surely you would expect the fgures to increase if only to allow for inflation.”
by Steve, California
Saturday, January 10 2009, 9:34AM
“Wow. If Nathan didn't have nonsensical bromides like "nanny state" and "politically correct" to rely on he would sound like a fool.
Well...he does anyway.
His goal, along with the commercial fishing industry is to catch every last fish in the sea then turn to the government for a handout.
The commercial fishing industry is just that. An industry and their only care is for profit. When they've squeezed every last bit of profit from the ocean they'll look for taxpayers to support them.
They should get real jobs.”