Gardener wins a landmark ruling over anti-fox hunting views
Anti-fox hunting views have been given the same legal footing as religion after a judge ruled that an animal rights campaigner's opinions amounted to philosophical beliefs.
Joe Hashman won the right to sue a garden centre for discrimination after he claimed he was sacked when its pro-hunting bosses discovered he was a leading animal welfare activist.
-

'Dirty Nails' gardening columnist Joe Hashman has won the right to sue former employers at a garden centre for discrimination after he claimed he was sacked when its pro-hunting bosses discovered he was a leading animal welfare activist. A tribunal date has yet to be fixed.
The management of Orchard Park Garden Centre, in Gillingham, Dorset, fought to prevent Mr Hashman bringing the case, claiming his views did not qualify as philosophical beliefs under employment tribunal rules.
But on Tuesday, an employment judge ruled in favour of Mr Hashman, who is a Western Morning News gardening columnist. In a decision that could pave the way for a procession of similar claims, Judge Lawrence Guyer said: "The claimant has a belief in the sanctity of life.
"This belief extends to his fervent anti fox hunting belief (and also anti-hare coursing belief) and such beliefs constitute a philosophical belief for the purposes of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003."
The country's leading pro-hunting organisation yesterday told the WMN it was "a shame" Mr Hashman himself failed to respect the beliefs of those in favour of fox hunting. A spokesman for the Countryside Alliance said: "This issue is not about hunting as much as it is about respect for beliefs, which is important to everyone, even though in this case it could be taking employment legislation to an extreme.
"It is a shame that Mr Hashman, who is so keen that his own beliefs be respected, has so little respect in return for those he has monitored and disrupted over the years as they hold to their own beliefs and manage the fox population in the UK."
The League Against Cruel Sports backed the decision, saying: "It is no-one's right to be cruel to an animal and an individual certainly shouldn't be discriminated against for holding this view."
Mr Hashman, of Shaftesbury, Dorset, said he was "thrilled" that his case would be heard.
"It's absolutely brilliant," he said. "It's quite amazing to know that the judge has listened to my evidence and understood what I'm trying to say because it's a very hard thing to articulate.
"I won't accept anything out of court. I'd rather go to the tribunal and come away with nothing than not have my case heard."
The owners of the garden centre, Sheila and Ron Clarke, are keen supporters of the South and West Wiltshire Hunt.
They claim Mr Hashman was dismissed from his job because the vegetable patch he ran at the site was not making enough money, not because of his anti-hunt views.
A date for the full hearing has not yet been fixed.








Most popular
1. Homeless rowers looking for shelter
2. Upgrade to car parking machines
3. Locals campaign to save their pub
4. Traders get TV to market
5. Reopened dry dock set to start work on first ship
1. Former Plymouth Argyle player Luke McCormick to join Swindon...
2. 768 racist incidents in Plymouth schools
3. Rural bodies clash over plan to destroy buzzards' nests
4. Radio 1 rocks Torbay
5. Lib Dems eye tax hike on second homes 'blight'
1. NIGHTWALK: Hundreds turn out for North Devon's biggest charity event
2. PHOTOS and VIDEOS: Olympic Torch in North Devon
3. REDS OFFER PRO DEAL TO JONES
4. Radio 1 rocks Torbay
5. Paignton's 'Little Messi' has pick of the League clubs to choose from