Hunt supporters bid to overturn ban with watchdog proposal

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, July 06, 2010
Profile image for This is Cornwall

This is Cornwall

Countryside campaigners are supporting plans to create a hunting watchdog to put the sport under stricter rules if a ban on hunts is overturned.

David Cameron pledged a free vote on a repeal of the Hunting Act if the Conservatives swept to power.

But after the Tories failed to secure a majority, MPs are thought to be split between those who would support repeal and those who would vote in favour of the ban remaining.

In an effort to steer the controversial change through, a proposed Hunting Regulatory Authority (HRA) has been proposed to oversee the sport if it was legalised again.

The HRA, a proposal led by Lord Donoughue, the senior Labour peer, would apply a strict code of practice to ensure that hunting is carried out without causing unnecessary suffering.

It would also ensure that hunts respect property, land and crops and that it is only carried out on land with the permission of the owner.

Reports suggest the proposal has won the backing of Tory and Labour MPs and peers.

A spokesman for the Countryside Alliance said: "The Hunting Regulatory Authority is the compromise that should have come about when the Hunting Act was passed in 2004. The Hunting Act must be repealed, but we are putting in place an independent system to regulate hunting rather than going back to the pre-ban status quo."

Breaches of the rules could result in prosecution in the courts with those found guilty fined or permanently disbarred from hunting. A similar system operates in Northern Ireland.

Lord Donoughue led a 2007 review of greyhound racing aimed at eradicating cruelty and has worked to improve the horse racing industry.

He said there could be "no return" to the situation before the ban and hunting people could not simply turn back the clock. "We are trying to put forward a more moderate compromise approach," Lord Donoughue said.

"We need to achieve a proper balance between the needs of animal welfare, the need to avoid deliberate cruelty and the rights of the countryside to pursue its sports such as hunting."

Lord Donoughue, a former agriculture minister who was a senior adviser to Harold Wilson, appealed to Mr Cameron to throw his weight behind the compromise.

He said: "There is very strong support for the regulatory body within the sport.

"I think there is a reasonable chance that with a fair wind from the Government we could get this through the Lords and I think there is a fair chance that we would get it through the Commons."

The latest calculation is that up to 300 MPs are pro-repeal while the anti-hunting lobby can count on around 290 supporters in the new Parliament. Hunt supporters are hoping that with the offer of regulation dozens more MPs will support repeal.

Lord Donoughue said: "It is going to be quite a fight, but I think this is the best approach to this complex problem."

2
Tweet this article
Report

2 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Sandie, Devon

    Tuesday, July 06 2010, 5:28PM

    “Hunting IS causing deliberate cruelty.

    Riding out on horseback (with trained terrier-men who I have heard state the 'sport' is "pitting one trained live animal against another"), chasing a terrified fox to the point of exhaustion and having it ripped apart by dogs is NOT accidental.

    Digging a fox out after it has run to ground and 'giving' it to the dogs is NOT accidental.

    Fox hunting is NOT a means of pest control. If it was, why would some hunts breed foxes in false earths for the purpose of hunting?

    People should NOT be taken in by the 'coincidence' of current media hysteria surrounding foxes that has appeared just before the Conservatives try to repeal the current ban on hunting with dogs.

    I'm writing as someone who has been brought up in the countryside and is sickened by a very small minority's bizarre desire to mutilate animals. As civilized human beings we should not be discussing the tightening up of the practice of hunting with dogs; we should be discussing the tightening up of the ban of this bizarre and perverted so-called 'sport'.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Giles Bradshaw, rose ash

    Tuesday, July 06 2010, 1:35PM

    “The Labour Peer and former agriculture minister Lord Donoughue is
    introducing the Wild Mammal Protection Bill in the coming months. The
    Bill will make it a criminal offence to deliberately cause cruelty to a
    wild mammal and hunting will not be exempt.

    This is a radically different approach to the Hunting Act which is not
    based on cruelty.

    The anti hunt group The League Against Cruel Sports claim that 66% of
    hunts that it monitors are breaking the law. However they have only
    been able to secure a conviction in three prosecutions against hunts.
    This suggests that the current law is not working.

    One of the chief problems with the current situation is that the law
    does not have the consent of the hunting community it is meant to apply
    to.

    I think that the new legislation will have that consent because no one
    can argue they should have the right to be cruel.

    I hope that groups like the RSPCA and LACS will support the Wild Mammal
    Protection Bill and also the proposed Hunt Regulation Authority. This
    is an opportunity for all parties to work together to eliminate
    deliberate cruelty.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters