'Major retreat' over lower speed limits

Trusted article source icon
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Profile image for This is Cornwall

This is Cornwall

TRANSPORT ministers have been accused of a "major retreat" over plans to reduce speed limits on country roads.

Proposals launched last month could see 20mph speed limits for residential roads and a lowering of the 60mph limit to 50mph on single-carriage rural roads.

Transport minister Jim Fitzpatrick insisted the Government was not proposing blanket speed restrictions, but would offer guidance to local authorities that they could reduce the limit on dangerous roads.

He said proposals in the consultation aimed to reduce the death toll on the UK's roads by a third by 2020.

"We made a range of proposals; there are two carefully targeted to reduce speed," Mr Fitzpatrick said. "One: that local authorities reduce limits to 20mph on roads of a primarily residential nature, and around schools.

"And two: that highway authorities reduce limits on the most dangerous rural single carriageways from 60mph where the evidence supports it."

Shadow Transport Secretary Theresa Villiers said a petition on the Downing Street website made clear it was one of the Government's most unpopular policies – behind only a call for Gordon Brown to quit.

She added: "Labour's speed limit policy is the most unpopular thing in the country, apart from the Prime Minister, though admittedly he is ahead by a 30,000 comfortable margin."

Everything said by Mr Fitzpatrick "signalled a major retreat on the briefing on these issues given to journalists in March", she suggested, adding: "Why don't you go the whole way and drop the proposals on the table from the Government?"

But Mr Fitzpatrick hit back: "With the greatest of respect to journalists, there was no briefing to say we were reducing across the country the speed limit on single- carriageway roads from 60 to 50. We need to make sure that we assess the most dangerous roads and they have an appropriate speed limit."

Some 62 per cent of fatalities occurred on just 40 per cent of roads and data collected on an annual basis would help identify problem routes. "There is no retreat, it never has been a blanket ban, we are targeting where the 50mph limit ought to be introduced and we will be introducing guidance to local authorities, not an instruction and not a blanket reduction," Mr Fitzpatrick said.

Ms Villiers said reducing the default limit on roads would hit all motorists with a "collective punishment" for the actions of the "irresponsible few".

She accused the Government of failing to deal with "problem drivers", adding: "Why, after a decade in charge of our roads are they still using a test for drug drivers which is no more sophisticated than asking them to walk in a straight line? Why is the average fine for uninsured rogue drivers less than £200?" Reducing limits would not get those drivers off the road, she said.

7
Tweet this article
Report

7 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Denzil Pemberthy, Kernow

    Monday, May 18 2009, 6:23PM

    “I hope that no-one takes the previous letter seriously, this organistion is not recongnised by any of the branches of the British armed forces and it is clearly a racist, fascist organisation, the same type that I, and many hundreds of thousand more, fought against in the last war.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Reg, Portugal

    Sunday, May 17 2009, 6:15PM

    “Oliver, Exmouth is right. It's a crass system that puts the deed below the cost of putting a wrong deed right. It never fails to amaze me that you drive uninsured, unlicensed etc and get fined a few quid when you are caught. What the hell happens if someone dies as a result? This Government doesn't give a toss”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Reg, Portugal

    Sunday, May 17 2009, 6:05PM

    “In any event, maximum sentences are never imposed - for anything. Look at murder”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by davey, devon

    Saturday, May 16 2009, 5:47PM

    “The maximum fine for driving uninsured is £5000. In 2007 the police towed 150,000 vehicles an average of 400 a day.

    It's not the speed that's important for efficiency when driving a vehicle, it's the rpm. You can drive just as efficiently at 20mph as you can at 50, just choose the right gear. Either way, you wouldn't be suggesting we should drive at 50-60mph through built up areas, would you.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Oliver, Exmouth

    Saturday, May 16 2009, 3:34PM

    “Yes, why is the average fine for being uninsured less than £200 - far less than the cost of getting insured. I would have thought that £1000 fine and/or confiscation of car would be a starting point.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Taurus, Redruth

    Saturday, May 16 2009, 2:58PM

    “Shower of muppets - for this government - is a good description. They go on and on about carbon emissions and yet here they are creating more. At 20 mph we'll be in 2nd or 3rd gear - Bad for the environment. And a motor vehicle is at it's best travelling between 56 and 60 mph. 50 will be another mistake. Idiots. MPs should go back and count the expenses they intend repaying before going to prison.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Reg, Portugal

    Saturday, May 16 2009, 12:07PM

    “This shower of Muppets cannot control speeds on roads leading into Towns and cities where they are shown as 30 - what chance in the country? You still have the reckless kids speeding and killing on those roads in any case. Further, the punishment system issues neither deterrent nor sentences to enforce the intended crass stupidity and I think the Government are trying anything at the moment to divert opinions from the present disaster and chaos.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters