Plan to build 5,500 homes on the east of Plymouth is agreed
THE delayed plan to build a new town on the outskirts of Plymouth has been given the green light.
South Hams councillors gave their approval yesterday to the development of 5,500 homes in Sherford Valley south of the A38 at Deep Lane.
-

Building work could start next year – more than 15 years after the development was first launched – if Plymouth planners also give the thumbs-up.
The site extends over Plymouth's borders, and councillors on the city planning committee are expected to consider the final details of the application in February or March next year.
The ambitious scheme was first approved in 2008 and then tripped up by the credit crunch and the complexity of negotiations. A revised scheme was approved by Plymouth planners in 2009.
Members of the South Hams development committee were split by 15 votes to seven over the plan.
Keith Baldry, South Hams councillor for Yealmpton, attacked the decision because of a cut in the proportion of affordable housing.
Planners originally envisaged that half of homes would be "affordable", but the scheme agreed yesterday allowed for as little as 20 per cent affordable housing.
Mr Baldry said: "The committee has taken the wrong decision. There will be no benefit to the people I represent or the inhabitants of the South Hams.
"The proposed number of affordable houses is pitiful. Four out of five dwellings will not be affordable. Instead there will be a big influx of people to buy the expensive houses. This is not what South Hams residents need."
He said roads in the area, especially the A379, would be overwhelmed.
"The original proposal from the developer included a great many ideas for community facilities, shops, schools, transport and affordable houses. These were postponed in the plans agreed today. The three weeks allowed for public consultation was a disgracefully short time."
Mr Baldry is leader of the Liberal Democrat group on South Hams District Council and leader of the Opposition.
A spokesman for Red Tree, the developers, said: "The agreement approved by South Hams and due to be considered by Plymouth City Council follows extensive discussions with the planning authorities and consultation with stakeholder groups and members of the public over several years."
James Koe, partner at Red Tree, said: "The approval of the terms of the planning agreement is a key step in delivering the vision for Sherford and the benefits it will bring in terms of new affordable and market homes, thousands of jobs and hundreds of millions of economic investment in the South Hams and Plymouth.
"We welcome the decision by South Hams planners and look forward to a decision regarding the planning agreement by Plymouth City Council early next year.
"Should the Plymouth committee decide to approve the Section 106 Agreement, Sherford will then rapidly move on to its construction phase and we would expect to start work on site during 2012."
South Hams District Council said: "Red Tree sought agreement to provide 550 affordable homes during the first half of the development.
"In a recorded vote the development committee gave outline planning permission to approve the go-ahead of plans subject to agreement by partners Plymouth City Council.
"The Sherford project will include two wind turbines and business and commercial space.
"It will also have a town hall, public library, green spaces. It will be bus and bike friendly, have three new primary schools and one new secondary school, healthcare facilities, park and ride interchange, and community park."
The South Hams spokesman said: "No firm start date is yet available as detailed plans are still to be confirmed.
"Hopes are that, unlike in 2008 when initial outline planning was granted and then thwarted by a downturn in the economy, that there would be an earlier rather than later start."








21 Comments
View all
by PL1Plym
Friday, December 09 2011, 3:50AM
“Hope the plans include one of those very long, wide and straight roads where the buses of the sky take off and land! (Just trying to not use the "A" word to avoid this sites "A" comment filter!!!)”
by Workitout
Thursday, December 08 2011, 10:35PM
“House Prices??
This place will get all the fallout from.
1. The Incinerator at Devonport. (That has got to be bad)
2. Any "lack of control" over Nuclear waste at Devonport.
3. Nice place !!
Anyone think that the houses are not needed!!!!!
Probably No!!!
Anyone think that there are far too many people in the UK?????
Anyone think that the Immigrants should get jobs?????
Anyone think that the "Bone Idle" "Born " should get off their Bums and "Do Something"”
by kym1960
Thursday, December 08 2011, 10:03PM
“i would just like to know were the jobs for people are going to be coming from because there are factory closing every week and no new work coming to plymouth and most that are working work for under were the next you could be moved on we need more factory work to come here ?”
by trongo
Thursday, December 08 2011, 7:08PM
“The traffic problem could be sorted if they built a park and ride over in plymstock somewhere.”
by GreenGOM
Thursday, December 08 2011, 6:31PM
“Doesn't the previous comment amount to blatant racism? Typical of thick Janner mentality.”
by timplymouth
Thursday, December 08 2011, 4:48PM
“Out of 5,500 households I doubt there will be 5,000 people commuting into the city over laira bridge. The new community will be close to the A38 so a lot of people will use that to get to anywhere except prince rock / cattedown. If they work in Plympton they can use Plympton hill. http://tinyurl.com/7tzj7o8”
by mcspredder
Thursday, December 08 2011, 4:43PM
“"...thousands of jobs and hundreds of millions of economic investment in the South Hams and Plymouth."...
Has anyone seen the figures for this or is it pie in the sky guesstimate?”
by sonofmeldrew
Thursday, December 08 2011, 4:06PM
“What about the daily commuters from the Kingsbridge side into Plymouth using the A379?
As we know getting into the city from the Plymstock side of the bridge at rush hour is already perceived by many as stupid road planning despite the months and months of so called improvements over at the East end.
What is it going to be like with an extra 5,000 vehicles (it will be more than that) not to mention all the additional heavy Lorries which will be needed during the long years of construction. The A379 is going to be a wreck isn't it. How could the condition of the A379 be worse than it is now? No doubt, as usual nothing will be done to alleviate this even though we all know how it will end up....Nightmare.
Are the developers intending on improving the transport infrastructure into the city from Sherford before they put this amount of extra burden on the A379? This road is already crumbling and becoming a driving hazard through lack of attention. Have you seen the approach to Brixton lately? Terrible.
So who's going to put investment into the transport infrastructure for this then?”
by timplymouth
Thursday, December 08 2011, 3:39PM
“About time, hurry up and get them built.
We already have tiny houses in the U.K. http://tinyurl.com/22mh4tf If we build more small houses that will get worse and families will be growing up without gardens or room to exercise. It doesn't matter if they are 'affordable' or not, as long as they are built. Supply and demand will take care of the rest. If we build big houses people who are currently living in medium sized houses will move up and the people living in small houses can also move up. Prices will adjust to demand.”
by Mark2Plym
Thursday, December 08 2011, 2:35PM
“There was a proposal to build affordable housing on the MOD land at Camels Head, but now being used for an incinerator, better returns for the MOD.”