Shock warning on sea levels
THE COASTAL map of the Westcountry could be dramatically
redrawn by the waves if expert predictions of a rise of up to
-

four metres in sea level become a reality.
It would go far beyond previous expectations that remote and
sparsely populated coastal areas would be beyond salvation, and
mean that large swathes of towns and even cities could be
swallowed up by the English Channel over the next century.
It comes as a senior Government adviser has warned that the
country should prepare for a temperature increase of 4C (7F) –
well above the 2C level which scientists regard as critical. It
would mean that some of the best-known features of Devon and
Cornwall could be lost for good, including flora, bird life,
butterflies and even the region's treasured beaches.
Phil Dyke, coastal property manager for the National Trust,
said alarm bells rang when NASA scientist James Hansen warned
that sea levels could rise by four metres over the next
century, rather than the widely accepted figure of one metre.
The climatologist has been widely quoted as saying that sea
levels will rise by "at least a couple" of metres this century,
with the largest estimate at four to five metres.
He says the lower figure, agreed by the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), fails to properly consider the
contribution made by the melting of ice sheets.
Mr Dyke said such an increase would have "major
implications" for the Westcountry. He said: "When NASA start
saying that sort of stuff, you start thinking 'OK, there's
probably something in this'."
He said a gauge at Newlyn, used for recording the rise in
sea level for the whole country, had recorded an increase of
20cm over the past 60 years. He said the trend of a rise of
three to four centimetres each year was likely to continue for
the next two decades – after which it would start to increase
"exponentially" because the ice would respond to the increase
in the change in temperature.
On top of that, an increase of ferocious storms would have
dire consequences, with increasingly powerful waves lashing
ever closer onto the shore.
The National Trust, which owns a number of coastal areas
around Devon and Cornwall, has carried out a range of studies
over recent years.
At St Michael's Mount, a study of historical records shows
the window of low tide at which people can walk across the
causeway to the island has shrunk from three hours two
centuries ago to two hours today. Based on current models, the
time slot will be down to an hour in 40 years' time.
And at Mullion, the trust has had to make a tough decision
on how best to defend the historic harbour. Instead of spending
£6 million on a granite reef with a life span of just 25 years,
it has opted to repair storm damage this time, but next time to
retreat to a logical point and sacrifice the rest – a pattern
which will mean there could be no harbour in 60 years.
Mr Dyke said: "As an organisation we aren't really into
change. Our general brief is conservation, and we are used to
believing we can hang on to things forever – but we have to
accept the reality of the situation."
He said a four-metre sea level rise would leave coastal
communities – including estuary cities such as Plymouth –
vulnerable. It would mean tough decisions would have to be made
about where to spend money on defending communities.
He said: "If there is a rise of four metres, us worrying
about Mullion harbour will be totally insignificant. It would
have serious implications."
He said the sector was now awaiting a report of the UK
Climate Impact Partnership, which is being led by the
Exeter-based Met Office. When it is published in November, it
will provide a more detailed and comprehensive picture on a
range of climate change areas, including sea level rise.
Mr Dyke speculated that comments by Professor Robert Watson,
chief scientiofic adviser to the Department for Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs, that the UK should prepare for a 4C
increase in climate could be paving the way for radical new
thinking on the issue.
But Ben Johnstone, South West regional flood risk manager
for the Environment Agency, was sceptical about the claim. He
said climate change and rising sea levels were "key
priorities", which formed the "bedrock" or all flood risk
management decisions.
But he added: "While rising sea levels are a huge concern,
we consider a four-metre rise to be excessive."
He said the agency works on Government guidance that a
one-metre rise is likely over the next century.
"Although this is lower than Professor Hansen is saying, the
implications will be felt by everyone who lives here. It's a
serious concern and one which must not be ignored," he
said.
Yesterday, a spokesman for the Met Office said the one-metre
sea level rise estimated for the next century took into account
40cm from the Greenland ice cap and 40cm from Antarctica, as
well as 20cm from the thermal expansion of the body of water.
He said Mr Hansen's estimate was an "extreme example".
A Defra spokesman said: "Based on the evidence, it is
unlikely that changes in ice sheet flows will cause global sea
level rise by as much as four metres by 2100. However, much
more work needs to be done to fully understand the potential
impacts of ice sheet flows to increased sea levels due to
climate change."












10 Comments
View all
by Bob Ashton, Barnstaple
Saturday, August 16 2008, 8:34PM
“Well, there's a surprise! The IPCC agrees with James Hansen. It has no choice if it is to continue to be the prime propaganda source for the political machine in keeping people in fear of the future!”
by gordon, paignton
Saturday, August 16 2008, 12:20PM
“Same old James Hansen, I fear. The climate is changing. Undeniable. Whether hysterical views contribute is doubtful, but it does ensure funding for their cause. And continued employment.”
by Pedro, Dubai
Saturday, August 16 2008, 5:32AM
“Can you believe anything that comes out of NASA.
Remember there are people even today who still do not believe that man landed on the moon. Then there is the subject of aliens and then life on Mars and so on!! This view might be just a tad unfair.
History shows us that the natural elements have changed over time and also that large parts of the UK coast line have been reclaimed by the sea. Man has never been able to tame nature and never will. As far as the subject of weather goes predictions appear to be matters of opinion.
Is this not just one opinion against another, one mans interpretation of mathmatical calculations against another. I for one will not lose too much sleep over it.
Just in case someone thinks because I dont live in Cornwall I dont care, let me tell you if the sea rose 4m then my current home in Dubai would be swept away but my home in UK would survive however it would be on its own island.”
by david glover, NSW Australia
Saturday, August 16 2008, 1:50AM
“could sealevel rises be mitigated by desalinating water using renewable energy (hotrock geothermal) andusing that water to irrigate arid and desert areas on obviously a vast scale to produce food and fuel crops?”
by Martin, Canada
Friday, August 15 2008, 10:55PM
“Philip, for a doctor you have a disappointingly unscientific outlook. Climate is not the same as weather, and to conflate them like this is entirely inappropriate. Here's an example that should be clear to you - you cannot predict that a particular smoker will die early, but you can predict that overall smokers will die earlier than non-smokers.
Also there is no evidence whatsoever that sea levels are falling, in fact they continue to rise each year. Finally the "global warming has stopped" myth overlooks the fact that climate varies on a timescale of decades rather than years, and 1998 was a particularly warm year brought about by a confluence of events (back to the one smoker versus the population again.) On average the last 10 years are the warmest on record.”