Second home owners to pick up "zero" water bills amid anger over Government rebate
Second home owners could escape paying anything on their water bills under the Government's £50 per year annual reduction in water charges, it has emerged.
Customers who use less than the annual rebate each year – such as infrequent visitors to small cottages – may not be charged anything at all, South West Water has confirmed.
-
Meanwhile, 70,000 householders who pay business rates and council tax at their home address – such as rural post offices and small shopkeepers – will not save a penny, regardless of whether they use water as part of their operation.
The anomalies have come to light as bills begin to land on doormats across the region as part of a compensation scheme for the botched water industry privatisation.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Wednesday, May 22 2013
South West customers have been paying for the upkeep of a third of the nation's beaches, paying the highest bills in the country for many years.
A spokesman for the company said "zero" bills were possible though no cash would be paid out in the event of a "credit".
See tomorrow's Western Morning News for more.
9 Comments
by pogle63a
Thursday, February 14 2013, 7:53AM
“Water rebate what a joke that has already been nabbed by next years council tax increase. Stay down peasants!!!!!!”
by Fistral20
Thursday, February 14 2013, 7:50AM
“Oh dear, doesn't the mention of second home owners get some people's backs up? No matter what your thoughts on that particular topic josdave (and I think I've worked it out), why should anyone, irrespective of their status or wealth, pay for something they don't use?
I've said in previous posts where second home owners have been criticised that they proportionately more than permanent residents because, for example, a 100% Council Tax bill for 50% residence effectively equates to double the payment in my books.
Get over it.”
by sasquatch1
Thursday, February 14 2013, 6:59AM
“Water rates as already mentioned cover the considerable costs of maintenance as already mentioned.So second home owners should certainly pay a small amount towards these costs,rather than actually getting free water,however little it may be.”
by OscarDelta
Wednesday, February 13 2013, 8:36PM
“Man, these news vultures will find a negative in anything, won't they!”
by Devonview
Wednesday, February 13 2013, 8:07PM
“They may not use the water but they require the drains, the clean water, the sewage whilst they're here in their second homes. That doesn't need repair & maintenance only when they're here.”
by Waltersmith
Wednesday, February 13 2013, 7:54PM
“Use less water - we got through 18 metres last quarter - and could easily use less”
by josdave
Wednesday, February 13 2013, 7:49PM
“Of course they are using the service even if they're only there a few weeks of the year why should they get it for free when we have to pay through the nose for it?”
by JMonners
Wednesday, February 13 2013, 7:22PM
“Well if they arent using any why pay??”
by josdave
Wednesday, February 13 2013, 7:06PM
“Given that the rebate is coming from the Treasury - that is us the taxpayers- and not the well stocked coffers of SWW we aree not only rebating ourselves but also looking after those who turn our towns and villages into ghost towns out of season.”