Sides line up in the battle for Plymouth City Airport site and north Plymouth
MILLIONS of pounds are at stake as rival plans to develop the north of Plymouth go head-to-head tomorrow.
Plymouth City Council will face down challenges to its proposals to create a new community of thousands of homes and a major new shopping centre on the old Seaton Barracks parade ground.
-

Sides line up in the battle for Plymouth City Airport site and north Plymouth
A Government planning inspector will spend at least four days this week and next considering whether the council's Derriford and Seaton area action plan is "sound".
Sutton Harbour Holdings will try to persuade the inspector that the council was wrong to exclude the airport from its area action plan.
From Monday to Friday,
Come and enjoy our special menu at £12 per person for 3 course-meal.
Terms:
Not in conjunction with any other offers.
From Monday to Friday for lunch and dinner.
Subject to availability.
Contact: 01752 424381
Valid until: Wednesday, July 31 2013
Meanwhile Wharfside Regeneration Ltd will revisit its arguments made at a planning inquiry last autumn.
Wharfside wants to build a shopping centre next to Derriford Hospital on the so-called North West Quadrant.
The Derriford and Seaton area action plan is the seventh piece in the city's planning blueprint.
Plans have already been adopted for: City Centre and University, Central Park, Sutton Harbour, North Plymstock, Devonport, and Millbay and Stonehouse.
The Secretary of State has appointed Andrew Seaman to hold the examination into the soundness of the area action plan. Mr Seaman will hear all the arguments at an examination in public, starting tomorrow at the Jurys Inn in Plymouth City Centre.
The hearings – which are open to the public – will continue next Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, with the option to return on April 10.
The area action plan covers the period up to 2021.
The council staked out its territory in the debate last week, when it unveiled its vision of a new "high street" in the north of Plymouth.
The shopping centre will be at the heart of a new community of 3,000 homes, GP surgeries, a school, library, pub and restaurants. The aim is to encourage the creation of 8,000 new jobs by 2026.
The proposed Derriford district centre will be set in almost 12 acres next to the Future Inn in Tavistock Road.
"This will be a new heart for the north of the city, and not a massive out-of-town shopping centre," council leader Tudor Evans said.
David Draffan, the council's assistant director for economic development, said the north of the city – now home to about 4,000 residents – lacked community facilities, a shopping parade, GP surgeries and schools.
The development up to 2026 will include a new business park and could also have: a large new food store with high street shops; restaurants; houses; apartments and student flats; a library; community centre; health centre; and a pub or hotel.
It will include the proposed new Forder Valley link road, which will help to relieve congestion in the north of the city, and a new countryside park.
The proposals have survived two changes of political control at the council.
Among those who have made representations to the inquiry are the Plymouth Civic Society, South West Water, British Land, Prudential Property Investment Managers, the Harvest Partnership and the Hawkins Trust.
Log on to thisisplymouth. co.uk from 10am tomorrow to follow the examination live
NORTH WEST QUADRANT PLAN
A DEVELOPER is using the economic argument to oppose council plans for a major new shopping centre, writes political reporter Keith Rossiter.
Wharfside Regeneration, which challenged the council’s vision for Derriford and Seaton at a planning inquiry last autumn, returns to the fray this week.
Last year Wharfside appealed against a decision by Plymouth planners to put a shopping centre on the old Seaton Barracks parade ground instead of Wharfside’s own proposal for a site next to Derriford Hospital, the so-called North West Quadrant.
The issue was thrashed out in front of a planning inspector last autumn, but the decision of the Secretary of State will not be made known until after the area action plan inquiry.
John Oxley, a Wharfside director, said: “Our North West Quadrant site has the opportunity of being developed quickly with Plymouth City Council support and this would be an investment running to some £150million,” he said.
“The private sector is waiting for realism and the much-needed creation of wealth for the city.
“Success [for Wharfside] will mean a great investment for Plymouth with job creation that is much needed.”
Thomas Hill, QC, for Sutton Harbour Holdings, told planning inquiry inspector David Nicholson last autumn that if the Wharfside appeal was upheld it would cut off any possibilities of building a district centre at the former airport site.
And a planning consultant said the Wharfside proposals failed to satisfy the needs of the council’s area action plan for Derriford and Seaton, which include a large new supermarket.
PLYMOUTH CITY AIRPORT PLAN
THE former operator of Plymouth Airport forced the city council back to the drawing board last summer.
When the Labour administration took power in May 2012 it removed the airport from the Derriford and Seaton area action plan.
Council leader Tudor Evans said the fate of the Roborough site should be decided instead under the Plymouth Plan, which looks at planning issues up to 2030.
Former airport operator Sutton Harbour Holdings wants to develop a new community on the 113-acre site, exercising the so-called ‘Armageddon Clause’ in its 150-year lease on the airport.
The company has published its own masterplan for a massive housing and shopping development.
The masterplan, drawn up by Plymouth architects AWW, calls for a range of commercial, retail and residential units, including an hotel and food retail store, plus the first part of a proposed park and streets leading to a new town square and high street.
The second phase would include a new primary school, library and community centre, more retail and residential blocks forming the town square and a new pedestrian link to the University of St Mark and St John.
After the proposals were published the planning inspectorate ordered the city council to reopen public consultation on the airport site.
One of the main weapons in the council’s armoury will be a 38,000-signature petition backing the airport.
Sutton Harbour finds itself in the position of both opposing and supporting the city council.
Victory for the former airport operator will have to include defeat for Wharfside Regeneration in a complicated three-cornered fight.




14 Comments
View all
by nick475
Thursday, March 21 2013, 10:07AM
“Everybody knows your can paint what ever picture you want. Things aren't always as they appear.
A fully functioning airport for decades until a property developer got hold of it.
Fuel prices went up. making it cheaper for the private plane owners to fly to Dunkerswell to refuel rather than pay Sutton Harbour Holdings prices.
Changing the flight times from Plymouth to Manchester making it impossible for businesses in either city to commute in a day, making Plymouth an undesirable place to do business with.
Selling off the Gatwick slots. In turn, cutting us off from London and London businesses and investors.
But hey it's a win win situation. Because Sutton Harbour Holdings holds the Hundred and Fifty year lease, with an Armageddon Clause which allows them, if the terms of the lease can be changed from Airport land to Building land, would allow SHH to sell of the 113 acre site probably for a sum between £60 and £100 million. Of which they could take 25% . Come on it's a no brainer. Pay arround £450,000 for a 150 year lease. Wait a bit then get a return of 15 to 25 million pound return.
Also whilst it is non profit making. Have a clause in the lease which allows them not to pay any rent.
Wow. we'd all like a rent agreement like that.
I wonder if SHH would allow me to rent a house off them for 150 years. But if things didn't work out. They would sell the house and I would take 25%. And until they sell it. I could live there rent free. Wow sounds like a good deal to me.
Obviously Tudor Evans Did aswell at the time When he signed the agreement. But I think he has realised what is best for Plymouth now by opposing SHH
Even though the Airport failed whilst run by the property developers SHH it still, over the last 10 years. Generated over £150 million into the economy of Plymouth. Now, if thats not a good thing. I don't know what is.
Our Airport belongs to the People of Plymouth.”
by Foldart
Thursday, March 21 2013, 8:14AM
“You can dream...but the reality is no-one has the money or the licences or the desire to run an airport in Plymouth. Exeter is struggling, what hope has Plymouth got?”
by Dunthiel
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 4:25PM
“"Plymouth had an airport and they lost it. Not viable, despite what that small lobby says."
Still there and still viable actually. If you don't believe me go and talk to the consultancies brought in to work on it and generate reports for the council. The only non-viable thing about it is Sutton Harbor Holdings...”
by Foldart
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 4:04PM
“Plymouth had an airport and they lost it. Not viable, despite what that small lobby says. If it was viable there wouldn't be all this fuss. Can't blame SHH for Plymouth's slide into obscurity, it's been happening long before the airport closed.
It's where we are that's the cause, not the airport. Ask any major business and they'll tell you there are enough profitable areas of the country without investing in a backwater.”
by NICKNAUTHOR
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 2:17PM
“Airports are much more than places to catch planes. You can attend an in-transit business meeting, or do some shopping to say the least. Airports are among the largest investments for a city and that investment can pay dividends. Take a close look at how airports affect the economic growth and development of other cities for example, Exeter, Leeds, Cardiff, Bournemouth.
The investments in these Airports have led to manufacturing and distribution jobs, hotel, entertainment, retail jobs, conventions, trade and exhibition complexes; and office buildings that house air-travel with intensive executives and professionals. The close connection between airports and city development has been noted in several studies. A careful statistical study by economists have found associations between airport passengers city populations and employment growth, while controlling other factors that would be expected to shape growth. Other studies by economists also note a close connection between airline passengers and a city's employment growth, finding that a 10 % increase in passengers in a city generates a 1% increase in city employment. Studies conclude that: "the evidence confirms the common view that a good airline service is an important factor in any city's economic development.
Plymouth Take Note!”
by Dunthiel
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 1:39PM
“This is an opportunity to send Sutton Harbor packing and get on with planning for the future in North Plymouth and the city as a whole.
No matter what figures you draw up demonstrating economic impact and job creation for 'alternate uses', having a functional airport trumps them all.”
by Lashius
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 11:09AM
“Unless theres going to be some magic deal with an airline or 2 to provide low cost travel to europe Ive no interest in this, id welcome it if so as the next nearest airport `exeter` is stupidly overpriced for flights.....hell im booking a holiday at the mo for june to malaga....can someone tell me why its about 200 quid more expensive to fly from exeter then even bristol etc? the nearest budget friendly airport is bristol which is a fair drive away so that could be a niche plymouth could settle into....but other then that I dont see any point.”
by charlee789
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 10:40AM
“I bet this leads to SHH winning they always do, money speaks they say. The airport needs to be safeguarded and reopened not built on. I can't believe plymouth has this asset that many cities dream of and there letting it disappear. :( I think that losing the airport for good will be the killer blow for the city.
You only have to look around at plymouth since the airport closed, and things aren't looking rosy. Really worried for the city”
by plympaul
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 10:08AM
“we dont need this new community of houses and shops we all want our airport back!!!”
by shaun_us
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 9:46AM
“SOMEONE CONTACT MR BRANSTON AND HIS VIRGIN CREW.”