Tory rebels defy Cameron to vote against Press regulation

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Profile image for Western Morning News

Western Morning News

Three South West Conservative MPs have defied David Cameron by voting against plans for regulation that critics say will end 300 years of a free Press.

A deal has been struck between the leaders of the three main parties to create a new newspaper watchdog recognised by a body established by Royal Charter, instead of full state legislation.

  1. Westcountry MPs Richard Drax (S  Dorset), Jacob Rees-Mogg (N  E  Somerset) and Sarah Wollaston (Totnes) voted against the punitive damages clause

    Westcountry MPs Richard Drax (S Dorset), Jacob Rees-Mogg (N E Somerset) and Sarah Wollaston (Totnes) voted against the punitive damages clause

In the House of Commons, 13 Tory MPs voted against adding a clause to the existing Crime and Courts Bill which could see judges award punitive damages against publications which refuse to sign up to the new regime. Among the "rebels" were Sarah Wollaston (Totnes), Richard Drax (South Dorset) and Jacob Rees-Mogg (North East Somerset).

Dr Wollaston told MPs: "There has rightly been much talk about the victims of the Press, but we forget at our peril the victims of big pharma, of big corporations and of big state. I would far rather have our two-fingers- to-the-establishment, slightly out of control Press than a nervous press, a bankrupt press or a bland press."

Tons of Tiles Showroom now open!!

Tons of Tiles Ltd

View details

Print voucher

Come and have a look at the extensive range of tiles we have in stock at our Drake Mill, Estover showroom. Most items in stock to take away or delivery option available.

Terms: Showromm open Monday to Thursday 9am - 5pm and Friday 9am - 3pm.

Contact: 01752 421047

Valid until: Saturday, June 15 2013

Mr Drax, a former newspaper reporter, said in the Commons: "I warn everyone to think very carefully before taking too many further steps down this road, as it will in the future undermine the democracy and freedom we are in this place to defend and represent."

Mr Rees-Mogg, whose late father Lord Rees-Mogg edited The Times, warned of "the risk of increasing state power over our media leading not immediately to direct censorship, but to a self-censorship that we are already seeing, of the Press being reluctant to criticise the great and the good."

The measures voted through are intended as an incentive for publishers to co-operate with the new regulator. The exemplary damages provision, one of two pieces of statute required under the deal, was comfortably passed by a majority of 517, with backing from MPs including: Ben Bradshaw (Exeter, Labour), Oliver Colvile (Plymouth Sutton and Devonport, Conservative), Geoffrey Cox (Torridge and West Devon, C), George Eustice (Camborne and Redruth, C), Andrew George (St Ives, Lib Dem), Stephen Gilbert (St Austell and Newquay, Lib Dem), Sir Nick Harvey (North Devon, Lib Dem), David Heath (Somerton and Frome, Lib Dem), David Laws (Yeovil, Lib Dem), Oliver Letwin (West Dorset, C), Ian Liddell-Grainger (Bridgwater, C), Anne Marie Morris (Newton Abbot, C), Sheryll Murray (South East Cornwall, C), Sarah Newton (Truro and Falmouth, C), Neil Parish (Tiverton and Honiton, C), Dan Rogerson (North Cornwall, Lib Dem), Adrian Sanders, (Torbay, Lib Dem), Alison Seabeck (Plymouth Moor View, Lab), Gary Streeter (South West Devon, C), Hugo Swire (East Devon, C) and Mel Stride (Central Devon, C).

2
Tweet this article
Report

2 Comments

  • Profile image for ineedtherapy

    by ineedtherapy

    Wednesday, March 20 2013, 12:27PM

    “Yes...let's face it

    Any organisation that thrives on illegal activities such as phone hacking, back hander payments, and less than honourable activities such as deliberately mis quoting the people it interviews, and in the case of hillsborough down and outright lies can afford to take the moral high ground.

    The rather pathetic excuse that a lot of this is done "in the public interest" is downright disgusting and i find it offensive that this is trotted out at every opportunity.

    The press have failed to behave in the past and will no doubt continue to do so.

    The current proposal is voluntary...in as much as the individual papers need to sign up to this in order to be held accountable for it.

    For once the public can do something about it...if your paper of choice refuses to comply then simply do not buy it.

    Hit them where it hurts and in the only place they seem to care about - the bank balance”

  • Profile image for TrotskyOffski

    by TrotskyOffski

    Wednesday, March 20 2013, 9:53AM

    “Do we really want a press that are not free to make stories up and then forget to regulate themselves. This is the press that are campaigning for greater regulation of the banks, for greater regulation in the energy sector, for greater regulation of MPs expenses, in fact the press want greater regulation for practically everyone, er except themselves. Do as I say and not as I do.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article