Volunteers invited to join graffiti clean-up

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Profile image for Exeter Express and Echo

Exeter Express and Echo

EXETER cleansing bosses are working with police in planning a major offensive against graffiti.

There are plans to launch a pilot project in two city wards, which could see community associations provided with special kits so volunteers can clean off the paint.

  1. max+ 003

Complaints from residents have been increasing.

Robert Norley, the city's assistant director for environment, said: "We want to encourage communities to play a part in tackling and deterring graffiti.

BRAND NEW FORD B-MAX ZETEC 1.0 ECOBOOST FOR ONLY £7685*

Swanson Motor Company

View details

Print voucher

DRIVE AWAY A BRAND NEW FORD B-MAX ZETEC FOR ONLY £7685.
1.0 100PS Manual
WITH:
Electric Windows & Mirrors
Quickclear Heated Windscreen
15" Alloy Wheels
Bluetooth with Ford Sync
Fog Lights

Terms: *Drive away from only £7685 and then pay nothing for 24 months!
4.9% APR
Conditions Apply

Contact: 01626 240583

Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013

"We want to engage the community because if it is apparent that it is the community looking after an area, perhaps the perpetrators will be less likely to be active there."

The council is seeking funding from the city's Crime and Disorder Partnership for the cleaning kits.

Mr Norley said: "It will be cleaning materials suitable for domestic use, and we are not saying we are just handing graffiti cleaning over to volunteers.

"Instead it would be an initiative similar to litter picks we help residents with when Denis the Dustcart goes along – cleaning graffiti tags from a house wall or gate, and so on."

The city council is also about to launch a campaign against graffiti on Facebook.

Mr Norley said: "It is going to be called The Writing is on the Wall and the most troublesome and prolific tags will be featured as we try to encourage anyone with information about the tags or taggers to contact us."

The city council is also looking at producing packs for householders detailing how it can assist and advise in removing and preventing graffiti. It currently makes a charge for graffiti removal unless it is racist or offensive.

Mr Norley added: "Graffiti causes criminal damage and is a criminal offence – it is not just a little bit of fun and can land the perpetrator in hot water.

"It is not a victimless crime, and it is very costly to deal with – often its removal is not covered by someone's household insurance. Also it can make an area look run-down."

If the pilots are successful they will be extended to other areas. Meanwhile, city councillor Richard Branston has been successful in getting funding from the Exeter Canal and Quay Trust to help with graffiti removal on the Quay.

Cllr Branston said: "The trust has given £250 towards cleaning the graffiti down there. The trust is very keen to encourage more events to be held there."

Have you got a graffiti problem in your area? Let us know in the box below.

6
Tweet this article
Report

6 Comments

  • Profile image for StThomRes

    by StThomRes

    Thursday, March 14 2013, 4:05PM

    “Sarah_Jones11... what you're basically asking is 'should it be one rule for those who paint legally and within the confines of the law, and another rule for those that paint illegally and break the law.' The answer to this is clearly 'YES'. That's sort of the point of the law isn't it? Regardless of whether you personally like the outcome or not.

    Exebomb... there isn't any graffiti under exe bridges, there is only art. You might not like it, you might not consider it to be art, but that's what it is, and, for the most part, it has bought an almost complete stop to graffiti happening there, as is evident by the fact that the walls remain pretty intact. As they were when they were first painted. Graffiti is illegal; If it's painted legally within the confines of the law, then it isn't graffiti. Simple. In the same vein, how can you hate graffiti but like street art? Street art IS graffiti! It's painting illegally in the street. Just because you personally happen to find one style preferable to another, it doesn't change anything... They're still both equally graffiti when done illegally and they're both equally not when they're done within the law.

    Personally I walk past the bridges every day and I much prefer them now to how they were before. They've been covered in graffiti for years, at least now it's colourful, clean and interesting; before it was just tags, scribbles, obscenities, and badly drawn penises.”

  • Profile image for Exon_Iphone

    by Exon_Iphone

    Thursday, March 14 2013, 2:05PM

    “@Sarah_Jones11 - Do you mean the Devon County Council approved work in the Exe Bridge Sub ways which Exeter Council have no say over? As in the art work done by local school children? Not very charitable of you to bash the City Council for something they have no responsibility for and I'm sure all those school children would object to you having their community art scrubbed off. I think what the story is saying is that the Council are looking at trying to deal with illegal graffiti which it's responsible for, with the help of the community. Not the legal art work which Devon County have given people permission to do.”

  • Profile image for exebomb

    by exebomb

    Thursday, March 14 2013, 11:37AM

    “it looks better than the nonsence in the exe bridge subways which was completly authorised by the council. Maybe if they actualy authorised street art rather than graffiti then it wouldnt be so offensive”

  • Profile image for omnivore23

    by omnivore23

    Thursday, March 14 2013, 10:56AM

    “Oh I don't know - I reckon that looks pretty good - better than the bare wall!”

  • Profile image for Sarah_Jones11

    by Sarah_Jones11

    Thursday, March 14 2013, 9:54AM

    “The money for the Quay area - is that gonna be used to get rid of the council approved graffiti on the subways by the Exe Bridges, or is it one rule for one, and another rule for them ?”

  • Profile image for LTaylor12

    by LTaylor12

    Thursday, March 14 2013, 9:18AM

    “Instead of asking for volunteers why not make it compulsary to those claiming JSA and other government handouts. They've got all the time in the world to remove graffitti and provide other useful services in the community.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article