Why our green and pleasant land is vital
Farmer-bashing is back in fashion and this time it’s the livestock producers, for rearing cows and sheep that allegedly contribute to global warming. Next week the Western Morning News will be putting the other side of the story. Martin Hesp sets the scene
EAT less meat and save the planet. So shout the latest climate change headlines – but they're wrong.
The advice should be: eat the right kind of meat and save the environment, the landscape, the regional economy, jobs and an entire way of life.
There is nothing bad or harmful about the traditional way in which meat is produced here in the Westcountry.
Far from wrecking the environment, traditional grazing creates a landscape that is beneficial in so many ways. It not only shapes the way our beautiful countryside looks, but it's been stoking the region's economy for centuries.
Added to that, grazing animals produce delicious healthy meat – not to mention dairy products for which the Westcountry is world renowned.
But listen to the bald, all-embracing claims of all too many folk leaping on the climate change bandwagon, and you'd think all livestock-based farming is helping to wreck the planet.
You could argue that cheap, industrially produced meat is. But intensively farmed meat that gains weight by eating soya protein gleaned from land which used to be rainforest is a million miles from the nutritious, planet-friendly, meat we produce in this peninsula.
It is why the Western Morning News is embarking upon a week-long series called Livestock in the Landscape.
Starting in Monday's paper we'll be explaining why grazing is good – and why everyone should be backing our vital crusade because Livestock in the Landscape is not just about farming.
It's about defending an ancient way of life and environment-friendly production system that is being brushed aside by vast market forces, by greed, by ignorance and by hyperbole.
This is a subject which goes way beyond agriculture. It is a story that involves us all.
From the air we breathe to the water we drink, from carbon capture to healthy diet, from the regional economy to the landscapes we love.
It is no exaggeration to say traditional livestock grazing reaches far, far beyond the remit of a few agrarians, butchers and cheese-eaters.
Our story in a nutshell? This region in particular is very good at growing one natural crop – in fact, apart from clouds, grass is the most common natural entity that we see in our daily lives.
It's everywhere – from sea cliffs to high moors, from motorway verges to ancient meadows. But sadly, not even the most ardent vegetarian can do a thing with it.
However, we know some animals that can. Cattle and sheep are nature's great grass conversion machines. They achieve the magical alchemy of turning the inedible into the highly edible.
Since the advent of cheap oil, we've been busy ignoring this wondrous fact. Cheap meat comes from animals that never see the sun, fattened by proteins brought in from the far corners of the Earth.
No wonder the climate change lobby loathes the resultant product. An industrial cow has a carbon footprint larger than an elephant's.
The same cannot be said for the beasts we see grazing our hills and dales.










16 Comments
View all
by Freethinker, Cornwall
Sunday, November 29 2009, 11:11PM
“I wasn't saying that you said CO2 was a "toxic gas" Theo. Others within the UN have though. Even AL Gore has used those two words to describe CO2. I have to agree with Lord Monckton who was interviewed by Alex Jones the other day about the UN. He said "We would all save billions if we shut down the UN and all of it's hideous bureaucracy". I totally agree with him. I hate the taste of veggie burgers Theo. Best place for them is in the bin. Prefer a good meat burger with plenty of hot relish and some soft cornish yarg cheese on top. Good quailty meat from a local butcher. You may not be using Soya based products Theo, but many vegetarians do. Freethinker”
by Theo H, Lifton
Sunday, November 29 2009, 10:33PM
“Has anyone here seen me posting that CO2 is a "toxic gas"? No.
But lots of people post that there is so little CO2 in the atmosphere it is of no importance.
Then,like Freethinker, tell us it is essential for life - which it is.”
by Theo H (R, G and I), Lifton
Sunday, November 29 2009, 10:30PM
“Soya is not grown to make vegeburgers. It is overwhelmingly grown for animal feed, especially in the UK, for chicken feed.
By the way - I am a very good cook and cooking is my domestic hobby. And I cook brilliant veggie food - tonight a tarte tatine (an Irish apple pie - the crust is on the bottom, which is cooked with the crust on the top and then flipped over ;-) ). No need for soya, and no veggie I know uses it.”
by Freethinker, Cornwall
Sunday, November 29 2009, 10:00PM
“Well, that's one way of putting it Charles. It's always nice to let the wind flow freely. Had nature or God decreed that CO2 was a highly toxic gas, we wouldn't be here now. Life on Earth is dependent on this life giving trace gas. The more, the better I say. The greenies are very misguided people, Theo inparticular. Best Freethinker”
by Charles Henry 1945-(diuturnity), Somersetshire
Sunday, November 29 2009, 9:31PM
“:) Well said Justin! . . A really excellent diatribe! . I'm proud of you. . That's what you call, really telling the leprachaun'.
"Wherever you be,
Let your wind go free!
For holding it in,
Was the killing of me."
On a tombstone in the country in Australia.”
by Freethinker, Cornwall
Sunday, November 29 2009, 8:35PM
“Hello my green Irish blogger. The UN's Livestock's Long Shadow had aims of assesing the full impact of livestock sector on enviromental problems. From the way I see it Theo the Livestock's Long shadow document accuses the cow of the worst enviromental crimes- land degradation, water pollution, acid rain, bio-diversity and habitat loss, deforrestation. It seems that the UN scientists, those highly trustworthy guys who gave us "Climategate" and the useless, corrupted UNIPPC have stated here that cows and ruminants are responsible for generating 65% of anthropogenic nitrousoxide, 64% of anmonia, and 37% of the worlds methane. When you say to me about more industrialized agriculture I have to laugh. The double standards of the UN is beggers belief Theo. Even an Irish saint would be astonished. We are being told by the media and greenies to eat less meat and more non-meat products like Soy milk and veggie burgers etc... the production of which is the principle reason of deforrestation in the Amazon. The other use of Soyabeans for those degrading land use practices. It's used heavily for intensive, industrilized farming. Such as confinement animals-beef and diary cattle, pigs, poultry and fish for which pasturised cattle are blamed. The rainforrests are, in my view, not cleared in any drastic measure by independent farmers who graze a few cattle, no Theo, they are cleared by UN supported corporate giants under the policy of the world elleviating poverty all for the production of more of their seeds, which are genetic, rather than natural seeds. Seeds developed by bio-tech companies like Monsanto etc... The real paradox of this rubbish UN report is the way in which it avoids dealing with the twin conundrum of mass-scale monoculture grain production and confinement animal feeding operations. These in my view are the two destructive pillars of a industry gone bad. The UN loves to point it's dictator finger not at bad management pratices like feed and confinement dairies,but at the cows themselves, and certainly not at the the bo-tech companies like Monsanto, but the real farmers, who raise livestock in accordance with natures true principles on grass. Let the cows produce as much methane as possible. I'm all for more CO2 Theo, it's never done this world any harm, and it won't in the future either. Freethinker”
by Theo H, Lifton
Sunday, November 29 2009, 6:27PM
“@ Freethinker.
You posted:
"More UN propagandist junk science. First we have the deindustrialisation of our Western World...."
Ummmm. No. The "Long Shadow of Livestock" suggests a move to a _more_ industrialised livestock farming.
Did you didn't read it before posting?”
by Charles Henry 1945-(diuturnity), Somersetshire
Sunday, November 29 2009, 6:10PM
“:| The world will still be here with livestock farming as a necessary part of man's existence on this planet, long after we have both gone to meet our maker. . . As I said to Justin earlier, you all haven't yet understood just how insignificant we all are in the scheme of things. . . Best Charles”
by Theo H, Lifton
Sunday, November 29 2009, 6:01PM
“A long comment of mine is in the moderation queue.
But for the moment.
"The Long Shadow of Livestock" can be found on the UN Food and Agriculture Organization's website. (fao.org)
An interesting and radical critique of this, and of interest to organic farmers, can be found on the Guardian's website. Input "simon fairlie" (the author) and "a lot of hot air" into the Guardian's search box.”
by Theo H (Red, Green and Irish), Lifton
Sunday, November 29 2009, 5:54PM
“@ Sharon Daw, Callinton.
I agree with your post.
You are facing up to the free market. If you are of my age, you will recall that Maggie Thatcher said that prices should fall, and the consumer should force this fall by "shopping around" for the lowest price.
New Labour may be bad for farers - but so was Thatcher.”