Replace 'insulting' sign - pensioners
PENSIONERS' rights campaigners in the Westcountry have
backed a call to replace road signs which they say give a
-

Elderly people sign
"negative" image of elderly people.
The traffic sign depicting a hunched couple with a walking
stick, warning motorists to watch out for vulnerable
pedestrians, has been a familiar sight on the roads since the
1980s.
Campaigners are now calling for it to be replaced because
they claim it is insulting to today's fitter and more active
older citizens. They say it should either be replaced with a
more fitting image or with reduced speed limits to safeguard
elderly pedestrians.
Lizzy McLennan, Help the Aged senior policy officer, said:
"The sign portrays a small proportion of the older generation.
Very few older people are hunched over, with a walking stick.
They are assuming everyone who is old looks like that, and they
don't."
Gordon Lishman, director general of Age Concern, said: "The
motivation behind these signs – to make drivers more careful of
their speed in areas with residential care homes – is positive.
In practice, a reduced speed limit in such areas, as
implemented in school districts, would be a more welcome way to
achieve this."
Martyn Rogers, director of Age Concern Exeter, agreed. He
said: "I would go along with the fact that it's a negative
image that labels all elderly people as being stooped and
infirm, which of course is a long way from the truth. Maybe in
some areas we need to have something which says be aware of
pedestrians in general."
Although he accepted the signs could be seen as simply a
symbolic way to represent a certain group, rather than a direct
insult, Mr Rogers said: "It's still a subliminal message among
many others that just helps to make this an ageist
society."
He said the cost of replacing the signs would be a "drop in
the ocean" and he thought the Government should support the
notion of having signs that "do not discriminate against a
certain group or show a certain group in a negative light".
However, the Taxpayers' Alliance described the objections as
ridiculous and a waste of public money.
Campaign director Mark Wallace said: "They should pay more
attention to the real concerns of older people – rising taxes
and soaring household bills."
Wailim Wong, South West spokesman for the Department for
Transport, said there were no plans to change the signs in the
near future.
He said: "The official purpose of the signs is to warn
drivers that people with walking difficulties of any age could
be crossing the road and may need extra time."
The word elderly is no longer used in the Highway Code's
description. "It now says, 'Frail or disabled people are likely
to cross the road'," said Mr Wong.












7 Comments
View all
by Fred Kaler, Worcestershire
Sunday, November 23 2008, 3:45PM
“Have you nothing better to do than campaign to have this sign changed - What about Penions? What about means testing? What about residents in Sheltered Housing with no wardens?
Do I need to go on........”
by G.Dickinson, North West
Monday, September 29 2008, 10:49PM
“One is bound to observe that if signs were directed against younger people or minority groups there would be much more attention paid by the current administration!
our objections would be like spitting in the wind. It is a pity that we cannot get one umbrella organisation to speak for all the splintered groups for elderly people. When there are supposed to be 11 or so million of us we MUST have a very powerful voice if we can speak together!”
by john whiting, East Kent
Saturday, August 23 2008, 6:15PM
“It's a pity that some of the elderly people complaining about this sign haven't got anything better to do like turning their attention to getting a better pension for us "wrinklies". How long has this sign been in this form ?? A long time I suspect. As has been said before it's meant to remind drivers to take care. I write as someone being over 70 years old..”
by Granny, Paighnton
Friday, August 22 2008, 12:01AM
“What does it matter?
A granny is a granny. These human rights gang are an insult to all. Why don't they concentrate on things that really matter?
Grrrrrrrrr!!!!!
P.s...Mr P Heasant..Ha! Someone with a sense of humour. I like it.”
by Pushing 70, Buckfastleigh
Thursday, August 21 2008, 9:06PM
“Hear! Hear! W.Feasey. Have these people nothing of more importance to occupy their minds.”